Independent rediploidization masks shared whole genome duplication in the sturgeon-paddlefish ancestor
Mandáková, T. & Lysak, M. A. Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42, 55–65 (2018).
Google Scholar
Blanc, G. & Wolfe, K. H. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16, 1667–1678 (2004).
Google Scholar
Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 30, 159–165 (2016).
Google Scholar
Clark, J. W. & Donoghue, P. C. J. Whole-Genome Duplication and Plant Macroevolution. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 933–945 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wolfe, K. H. & Shields, D. C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708–713 (1997).
Google Scholar
Marcet-Houben, M. & Gabaldón, T. Beyond the Whole-Genome Duplication: Phylogenetic Evidence for an Ancient Interspecies Hybridization in the Baker’s Yeast Lineage. PLOS Biol. 13, e1002220 (2015).
Google Scholar
Du, K. et al. The sterlet sturgeon genome sequence and the mechanisms of segmental rediploidization. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 841–852 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cheng, P. et al. The American Paddlefish Genome Provides Novel Insights into Chromosomal Evolution and Bone Mineralization in Early Vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 1595–1607 (2021).
Google Scholar
Furlong, R. F. & Holland, P. W. H. Were vertebrates octoploid? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 357, 531–544 (2002).
Google Scholar
Meyer, A. & Van de Peer, Y. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). BioEssays N. Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 27, 937–945 (2005).
Google Scholar
Nakatani, Y. et al. Reconstruction of proto-vertebrate, proto-cyclostome and proto-gnathostome genomes provides new insights into early vertebrate evolution. Nat. Commun. 12, 4489 (2021).
Google Scholar
Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 820–830 (2020).
Google Scholar
Parey, E. et al. An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication. Genome Res. 32, 1685–1697 (2022).
Hokamp, K., McLysaght, A. & Wolfe, K. H. The 2R hypothesis and the human genome sequence. in Genome Evolution (eds. Meyer, A. & Van de Peer, Y.) 95–110 (Springer Netherlands, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0263-9_10.
Taylor, R. S., Daniels, R. R., Morata, D. P., Gundappa, M. K. & Macqueen, D. J. Evolution of ray-finned fish genomes: Status and directions with a primer on microRNA characterization. in Cellular and Molecular Approaches in Fish Biology 309–346 (Elsevier, 2022).
Xu, P. et al. The allotetraploid origin and asymmetrical genome evolution of the common carp Cyprinus carpio. Nat. Commun. 10, 4625 (2019).
Google Scholar
Session, A. M. et al. Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis. Nature 538, 336–343 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lien, S. et al. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 533, 200–205 (2016).
Google Scholar
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S. & Meyer, A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 725–732 (2009).
Google Scholar
Van de Peer, Y., Mizrachi, E. & Marchal, K. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 411–424 (2017).
Google Scholar
Conant, G. C. & Wolfe, K. H. Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 938–950 (2008).
Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. Patterns and Processes of Diploidization in Land Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 72, 387–410 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wolfe, K. H. Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 333–341 (2001).
Google Scholar
Robertson, F. M. et al. Lineage-specific rediploidization is a mechanism to explain time-lags between genome duplication and evolutionary diversification. Genome Biol. 18, 111 (2017).
Google Scholar
Conant, G. C., Birchler, J. A. & Pires, J. C. Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 19, 91–98 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gundappa, M. K. et al. Genome-Wide Reconstruction of Rediploidization Following Autopolyploidization across One Hundred Million Years of Salmonid Evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msab310 (2022).
Google Scholar
Martin, K. J. & Holland, P. W. H. Enigmatic orthology relationships between Hox clusters of the African butterfly fish and other teleosts following ancient whole-genome duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2592–2611 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rozenfeld, C. et al. De novo European eel transcriptome provides insights into the evolutionary history of duplicated genes in teleost lineages. PLOS ONE 14, e0218085 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hughes, A. L. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 256, 119–124 (1994).
Google Scholar
Ohno, S. Evolution by gene duplication. (Springer-Verlag, 1970).
Scannell, D. R., Byrne, K. P., Gordon, J. L., Wong, S. & Wolfe, K. H. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440, 341–345 (2006).
Google Scholar
Clark, J. W. & Donoghue, P. C. J. Constraining the timing of whole genome duplication in plant evolutionary history. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20170912 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-C. et al. The Litsea genome and the evolution of the laurel family. Nat. Commun. 11, 1675 (2020).
Google Scholar
Carretero‐Paulet, L. & Van de Peer, Y. The evolutionary conundrum of whole‐genome duplication. Am. J. Bot. 107, 1101–1105 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bi, X. et al. Tracing the genetic footprints of vertebrate landing in non-teleost ray-finned fishes. Cell 184, 1377–1391.e14 (2021).
Google Scholar
Thompson, A. W. et al. The bowfin genome illuminates the developmental evolution of ray-finned fishes. Nat. Genet. 53, 1373–1384 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dehal, P. & Boore, J. L. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3, e314 (2005).
Google Scholar
Cheng, P. et al. Draft Genome and Complete Hox-Cluster Characterization of the Sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus). Front. Genet. 10, 776 (2019).
Google Scholar
Braasch, I. et al. The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human-teleost comparisons. Nat. Genet. 48, 427–437 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fontana, F. Chromosomal Nucleolar Organizer Regions in 4 Sturgeon Species as Markers of Karyotype Evolution in Acipenseriformes (pisces). Genome 37, 888–892 (1994).
Google Scholar
Havelka, M., Hulák, M., Bailie, D. A., Prodöhl, P. A. & Flajšhans, M. Extensive genome duplications in sturgeons: new evidence from microsatellite data. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 29, 704–708 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ohno, S. et al. Microchromosomes in holocephalian, chondrostean and holostean fishes. Chromosoma 26, 35–40 (1969).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. et al. Extinction of one of the world’s largest freshwater fishes: Lessons for conserving the endangered Yangtze fauna. Sci. Total Environ. 710, 136242 (2020).
Google Scholar
Crow, K. D., Smith, C. D., Cheng, J.-F., Wagner, G. P. & Amemiya, C. T. An independent genome duplication inferred from Hox paralogs in the American paddlefish-a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 937–953 (2012).
Google Scholar
Symonová, R. et al. Molecular cytogenetic differentiation of paralogs of Hox paralogs in duplicated and re-diploidized genome of the North American paddlefish (Polyodon spathula). BMC Genet. 18, 19 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dingerkus, G. & Howell, W. M. Karyotypic Analysis and Evidence of Tetraploidy in the North American Paddlefish, Polyodon spathula. Science 194, 842–844 (1976).
Google Scholar
Shimodaira, H. An Approximately Unbiased Test of Phylogenetic Tree Selection. Syst. Biol. 51, 492–508 (2002).
Google Scholar
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).
Google Scholar
Siu-Ting, K. et al. Inadvertent Paralog Inclusion Drives Artifactual Topologies and Timetree Estimates in Phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 1344–1356 (2019).
Google Scholar
Philippe, H. et al. Mitigating Anticipated Effects of Systematic Errors Supports Sister-Group Relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria. Curr. Biol. CB 29, 1818–1826.e6 (2019).
Google Scholar
Steenwyk, J. L. et al. PhyKIT: a broadly applicable UNIX shell toolkit for processing and analyzing phylogenomic data. Bioinformatics 37, 2325–2331 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shen, X.-X., Salichos, L. & Rokas, A. A Genome-Scale Investigation of How Sequence, Function, and Tree-Based Gene Properties Influence Phylogenetic Inference. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 2565–2580 (2016).
Google Scholar
Telford, M. J. et al. Phylogenomic analysis of echinoderm class relationships supports Asterozoa. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20140479 (2014).
Google Scholar
Phillips, M. J. & Penny, D. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 171–185 (2003).
Google Scholar
Philippe, H. et al. Resolving Difficult Phylogenetic Questions: Why More Sequences Are Not Enough. PLOS Biol. 9, e1000602 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, S4 (2007).
Google Scholar
Varadharajan, S. et al. The Grayling Genome Reveals Selection on Gene Expression Regulation after Whole-Genome Duplication. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 2785–2800 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lahn, B. T. & Page, D. C. Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science 286, 964–967 (1999).
Google Scholar
Zwaenepoel, A. & Van de Peer, Y. wgd—simple command line tools for the analysis of ancient whole-genome duplications. Bioinformatics 35, 2153–2155 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tiley, G. P., Barker, M. S. & Burleigh, J. G. Assessing the Performance of Ks Plots for Detecting Ancient Whole Genome Duplications. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 2882–2898 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zwaenepoel, A., Li, Z., Lohaus, R. & Peer, Y. V. de. Finding Evidence for Whole Genome Duplications: A Reappraisal. Mol. Plant 12, 133–136 (2019).
Google Scholar
Macqueen, D. J. & Johnston, I. A. A well-constrained estimate for the timing of the salmonid whole genome duplication reveals major decoupling from species diversification. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20132881 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lartillot, N., Lepage, T. & Blanquart, S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25, 2286–2288 (2009).
Google Scholar
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H. & Painter, I. S. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1647–1657 (1998).
Google Scholar
Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. A Bayesian Mixture Model for Across-Site Heterogeneities in the Amino-Acid Replacement Process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095–1109 (2004).
Google Scholar
Giles, S., Xu, G.-H., Near, T. J. & Friedman, M. Early members of ‘living fossil’ lineage imply later origin of modern ray-finned fishes. Nature 549, 265–268 (2017).
Google Scholar
Káldy, J. et al. Hybridization of Russian Sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, Brandt and Ratzeberg, 1833) and American Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula, Walbaum 1792) and Evaluation of Their Progeny. Genes 11, 753 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ocampo Daza, D., Bergqvist, C. A. & Larhammar, D. The Evolution of Oxytocin and Vasotocin Receptor Genes in Jawed Vertebrates: A Clear Case for Gene Duplications Through Ancestral Whole-Genome Duplications. Front. Endocrinol. 12, 792644 (2022).
Google Scholar
Davesne, D. et al. Fossilized cell structures identify an ancient origin for the teleost whole-genome duplication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2101780118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Grande, L., Jin, F., Yabumoto, Y. & Bemis, W. E. Protopsephurus liui, a well-preserved primitive paddlefish (Acipenseriformes: Polyodontidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of China. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 22, 209–237 (2002).
Google Scholar
Swisher, C. C. et al. Further support for a Cretaceous age for the feathered-dinosaur beds of Liaoning,China:New 40Ar÷39Ar dating of the Yixian and Tuchengzi Formations. Chin. Sci. Bull. 47, 136–139 (2002).
Benton, M. J. et al. Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history. Palaeontol. Electron 18, 1–107 (2015).
Fawcett, J. A., Maere, S. & Van de Peer, Y. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5737–5742 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bemis, W. E., Findeis, E. K. & Grande, L. An overview of Acipenseriformes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 48, 25–71 (1997).
Google Scholar
Hilton, E. J. & Forey, P. L. Redescription of †Chondrosteus acipenseroides Egerton, 1858 (Acipenseriformes, †Chondrosteidae) from the Lower Lias of Lyme Regis (Dorset, England), with comments on the early evolution of sturgeons and paddlefishes. J. Syst. Paleontol. 7, 427–453 (2009).
Lu, L., Tan, K. & Wang, X. Redescription of Eochondrosteus sinensis (Acipenseriformes, Actinopterygii) and its geological age. Earth Sci. Front. 27, 371–381 (2020).
Bemis, W. E. & Kynard, B. Sturgeon rivers: an introduction to acipenseriform biogeography and life history. Environ. Biol. Fishes 48, 167–183 (1997).
Hibbins, M. S. & Hahn, M. W. Phylogenomic approaches to detecting and characterizing introgression. Genetics 220, iyab173 (2022).
Google Scholar
Smith, J. J. et al. Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 45, 415–421 421e1-2 (2013).
Google Scholar
Smith, J. J. & Keinath, M. C. The sea lamprey meiotic map improves resolution of ancient vertebrate genome duplications. Genome Res. 25, 1081–1090 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kuraku, S., Meyer, A. & Kuratani, S. Timing of Genome Duplications Relative to the Origin of the Vertebrates: Did Cyclostomes Diverge before or after? Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 47–59 (2009).
Google Scholar
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).
Google Scholar
Venkatesh, B. et al. Elephant shark genome provides unique insights into gnathostome evolution. Nature 505, 174–179 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tan, M. et al. The whale shark genome reveals patterns of vertebrate gene family evolution. eLife 10, e65394 (2021).
Google Scholar
Irisarri, I. et al. Phylotranscriptomic consolidation of the jawed vertebrate timetree. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1370–1378 (2017).
Google Scholar
Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. & Thornton, J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. CABIOS 8, 275–282 (1992).
Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F. & Bork, P. ETE 3: Reconstruction, Analysis, and Visualization of Phylogenomic Data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1635–1638 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M., McInerney, J. O., Hirt, R. P., Foster, P. G. & Embley, T. M. Of clades and clans: terms for phylogenetic relationships in unrooted trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 114–115 (2007).
Google Scholar
Page, R. D. & Charleston, M. A. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 231–240 (1997).
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
Google Scholar
Le, S. Q., Lartillot, N. & Gascuel, O. Phylogenetic mixture models for proteins. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. (2008) https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0180.
Le, S. Q. & Gascuel, O. Accounting for Solvent Accessibility and Secondary Structure in Protein Phylogenetics Is Clearly Beneficial. Syst. Biol. 59, 277–287 (2010).
Google Scholar
Si Quang, L., Gascuel, O. & Lartillot, N. Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction. Bioinformatics 24, 2317–2323 (2008).
Google Scholar
Redmond, A. K. & McLysaght, A. Evidence for sponges as sister to all other animals from partitioned phylogenomics with mixture models and recoding. Nat. Commun. 12, 1783 (2021).
Google Scholar
Redmond, A. K., Macqueen, D. J. & Dooley, H. Phylotranscriptomics suggests the jawed vertebrate ancestor could generate diverse helper and regulatory T cell subsets. BMC Evol. Biol. 18, 169 (2018).
Google Scholar
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10, giab008 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pedersen, B. S. & Quinlan, A. R. Mosdepth: quick coverage calculation for genomes and exomes. Bioinformatics 34, 867–868 (2018).
Google Scholar
Krzywinski, M. I. et al. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. (2009) https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.092759.109.
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Google Scholar
Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Bayesian Estimation of Species Divergence Times Under a Molecular Clock Using Multiple Fossil Calibrations with Soft Bounds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 212–226 (2006).
Google Scholar
Inoue, J., Donoghue, P. C. J. & Yang, Z. The Impact of the Representation of Fossil Calibrations on Bayesian Estimation of Species Divergence Times. Syst. Biol. 59, 74–89 (2010).
Google Scholar
Frey, L. et al. The early elasmobranch Phoebodus: phylogenetic relationships, ecomorphology and a new time-scale for shark evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20191336 (2019).
Google Scholar
Redmond, A., Casey, D., Gundappa, M. K., Macqueen, D. J. & McLysaght, A. Sturgeon-Paddlefish Whole Genome Duplication Data. (2023)